American Congress: Reaction Paper 3

Due Feb 9th.  D/O/L Chapter 3, “Going For It: Recruitment and Candidacy.”

I think for this chapter what would work best is to focus on half the chapter and think about how these aspects relate to representation and policy outcomes for Congress.  Below are some questions to think about when preparing your essay.

First Half: Focus on districts and redistricting.   What impact does districting and gerrymandering (define and discuss both partisan and racial/ethnic) have on Congress–consider how districts determine the “type” of representative/representation and the make-up of the House of Representatives?   Are local interests articulated well in lawmaking?  Are minority (in terms of numbers) viewpoints given the access the founders hoped?  What have the courts ruled?  Is there a better way to organize Congress?

Second half:  How does the structure of elections and candidate recruitment impact Congress?  What advantages do incumbents have?  What role does money play?  Have efforts to reform campaign finance been successful (why/why not)?  What does this mean for lawmaking?  Do expensive elections inhibit Congress from being representative?  Or, is money less influential than many would suggest?  How would you reform the campaign finance system?

Posted in American Congress | Comments closed

POLSC 110 Sec 51 AND Sec 53

Rakove — “The Politics Of Constitution Making”: You can find the reading here.

Section 53: Due Feb. 9th.

Section 51: Due Feb 12th.

What are the primary principles of the Virginia and New Jersey Plans?  What were the two sides debating these plans?

How does Madison radically shift the nature of  debate at the convention? What does Madison think the fundamental differences between states are?

What are the two major compromises reached at the Constitutional Convention?

According to Rakove, which compromise is more important to the long term political development of the U.S.?  Put another way, which compromise does Rakove view as more “revolutionary?”

Posted in POLSC 110 Sec 51, POLSC 110 Sec 53 | Comments closed

D/O/L: Hill Style & Home Style

Due Feb. 4

Does the existence of dual responsibilities (to lawmaking and constituency) improve our legislature’s representativeness?  (Consider who MCs–members of Congress- are, what types of policy voters care about, and what your ideal legislature might look like) The following questions from Chapter 5 might help you think about this question:

How does a MC’s constituency influence their public service?  What are relationships between MCs and their constituents based on?  What role does a home style play in building that relationship?  Once in Washington, D.C., how do MCs work to maintain ties to their constituents?  Do other actors help MCs cater to their constituents?

Posted in American Congress | Tagged | Comments closed

POSLC 110 Sec. 51 Reaction Paper 1

Due Feb. 5th.

These questions are just a guide.   You don’t have to address all (or any) of them.  Remember to identify the chief claim(s) the author makes in their piece.  You are to read all the documents, even the one(s) you were not assigned to write on.

For those of you reading Morone consider these questions:
1) Is the United States a Christian country?
2) Does the Social Gospel still exist today? What about Neo-Puritanism? How are they different?
3) What role should religion play in politics?
4) What does Morone think the role of religion is in American politics?

For those reading the Declaration of Independence and Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions:

1) Who are the founder writing to in the Declaration of Independence?  What about Elizabeth Cady Staton and signers of the Seneca Falls Resolutions?

2) What are the nature of the grievances in each document?

3) Why/how did the authors of the Seneca Falls Resolutions compare the oppression of women in the mid-nineteenth century to the oppression faced by American colonists?  Why frame their claims in that language?

4) Are these persuasive documents?

Posted in POLSC 110 Sec 51 | Comments closed

POLSC 110 Sec 53: Reaction Paper 1

Assignment Due February 2nd.

These questions are just a guide.   You don’t have to address all (or any) of them.  Remember to identify the chief claim(s) the author makes in their piece.  You are to read all the documents, even the one(s) you were not assigned to write on.

For those of you reading Morone consider these questions:
1) Is the United States a Christian country?
2) Does the Social Gospel still exist today? What about Neo-Puritanism? How are they different?
3) What role should religion play in politics?
4) What does Morone think the role of religion is in American politics?

For those reading the Declaration of Independence and Seneca Falls Declaration of Sentiments and Resolutions:

1) Who are the founder writing to in the Declaration of Independence?  What about Elizabeth Cady Staton and signers of the Seneca Falls Resolutions?

2) What are the nature of the grievances in each document?

3) Why/how did the authors of the Seneca Falls Resolutions compare the oppression of women in the mid-nineteenth century to the oppression faced by American colonists?  Why frame their claims in that language?

4) Are these persuasive documents?

Posted in POLSC 110 Sec 53 | Comments closed

New Congress Links

Class,

The course website is a work in progress.  I’ll add new links and content as I see fit.  American Politics, but more importantly Congress is really dynamic–so to paraphrase a wise soul, new stuff comes to light all the time.

You can track the activity of Congress (votes, hearings and debates) on this interactive feature from the NY Times Online.

Someone asked about the midterm elections after class.  The New York Times had a feature on primaries to watchChris Cillizza, an election handicapper, provides weekly updates on competitive elections in his Washington Post blog.  This horse-race aspect of politics might be scorned (often rightfully so) in some courses but in Congress elections matter for a variety of reasons.

Posted in American Congress | Comments closed

POLSC 235: The Two Congresses and Evolution of the Modern Congress

For the response paper consider the following questions:  (Remember to compose the paper as an essay)

What do the authors mean by the phrase two congresses?  Are these dual roles complementary or in conflict?  What challenges do they pose to representatives and the body itself?  What is distinct about the modern congress?  Has the body’s evolution helped to reconcile these two roles or exacerbated the conflict?

Posted in American Congress | Comments closed

State of the Union

Last night the President delivered the State of  the Union speech.  You can view, read, and utilize other interactive features here.   While much of the punditry is concerned with how the speech was received, the speech is an attempt by President Obama used to set the political agenda for Congress.  What specifically did he call on the legislators to do?

Posted in American Congress, POLSC 110 Sec 51, POLSC 110 Sec 53 | Comments closed

Welcome Students For Spring 2010 Courses

Students,

I am teaching three courses this semester, American Congress & and two sections of American Government: A Historical Introduction.  Assignments and announcements for all three courses will be posted on this website.  The links on this site should also be helpful for you.  Occasionally I’ll post other content here containing links to articles or opinion pieces on contemporary news and political events.

I’ve created a category for each course. The easiest way to navigate this blog is to check the posts in the category for your course.  For those in my American Government: A Historical Introduction course, you need to remember your section number.  The courses have different schedules so they won’t move at the same pace.
I’ll see you all later this week.

Posted in American Congress, POLSC 110 Sec 51, POLSC 110 Sec 53 | Comments closed

POLSC 215–Afghanistan

On Thursday we’ll discuss President Obama’s plan to increase troop levels in Afghanistan.  You may also write a reaction paper to submit on Thursday.  For the paper, decide whether you support or oppose the President’s plan and use the readings to defend your position and identify counter-arguments.

Watch or read the text of President Obama’s speech where he outlines his surge plan here.  John Burns of The New York Times has engaged in a series of Q&A’s that should shed light on the following key factors: the details of the plan, the plan’s global impact, and issues of corruption and incompetence within the Afghan government.   J Alexander Thier writes in support of continued US engagement while Professor Andrew Bacivech questions the logic of the plan in an interview with NPR (listen or read the text).   President Obama has to convince an increasingly isolationist American public of his plan.

Posted in Public Opinion & Political Participation | Tagged | Comments closed